Construction Project Evaluation

Tender description

Evaluation of a match funded - private funding and Good Growth Shared Prosperity Funded Construction project. Assess Effectiveness and Impact: to see whether the project’s goals have been achieved and what impacts it has had; - Provide Accountability: to make sure that public funds have been used as intended; - Shaping Future Programmes: by taking lessons learnt from projects to design future programmes; - Understanding Value for Money: to see whether the project has been a good use of public money, which depends on the value of the grant given and the impacts it has had. Lot 1: Through reflection, the review should explore the project’s experiences with the Good Growth programme and its delivery and management team. More specifically, identifying the programme’s strengths, weaknesses and areas for improvement, and lessons learnt from: - first engagement with the programme; - the process of bidding and support received from the programme; - the contracting process; - delivery, claiming and ongoing project management support and contract management; - whether project activities delivered were in line with the original plan and if not, what were the reasons for any change. The process review should also assess project implementation, marketing and engagement, activities delivered, management and governance, and monitoring. The review should include conversations (via interviews or focus groups) with key staff and/or any delivery partners of the funding recipient, and other relevant stakeholders. Their perspectives should be more diverse, detailed and demonstrate critical thought. Consultations with the project’s direct beneficiaries such as businesses, organisations or individuals. Lot 1: Through reflection, the review should explore the project’s experiences with the Good Growth programme and its delivery and management team. More specifically, identifying the programme’s strengths, weaknesses and areas for improvement, and lessons learnt from: - first engagement with the programme; - the process of bidding and support received from the programme; - the contracting process; - delivery, claiming and ongoing project management support and contract management; - whether project activities delivered were in line with the original plan and if not, what were the reasons for any change. The process review should also assess project implementation, marketing and engagement, activities delivered, management and governance, and monitoring. The review should include conversations (via interviews or focus groups) with key staff and/or any delivery partners of the funding recipient, and other relevant stakeholders. Their perspectives should be more diverse, detailed and demonstrate critical thought. Consultations with the project’s direct beneficiaries such as businesses, organisations or individuals.