IPA Benchmarking Hub Service (Beta)
Details
- Value
- GBP 400,000
- Published
- 1 June 2021
- Submission
- 15 June 2021
- Source
- uk:digital_marketplace
Tender description
Summary of the work The IPA Benchmarking Service product will house a core set of features that have been derived from user research & co-design workshops during Alpha. These features will make up the MVP to be developed during Private Beta, which is the current scope and requirement for the next 5 months Expected Contract Length 3-5 months role dependent Latest start date Thursday 1 July 2021 Budget Range 300-400k Why the Work is Being Done The benchmarking hub will collect project data from completed projects and provide access to this data to project leaders across government to support project investment decisions. Helping to leverage the UK Government’s project portfolio data to support and shape future investment decisions. The platform will collect data on previously completed projects and future projects. The IPA would like to have a final product available by March 31 2022 Problem to Be Solved Infrastructure projects across government and ALBs, continue to be delivered with a significant gap between estimated costs and actual costs. Benchmark project cost data is often procured from private companies in order to support cost estimating activity, for lack of good quality, available / accessible and trusted data. There is no clear or fully informed consensus on why some infrastructure projects cost what they do when compared to one another, or the intricate drivers causing inaccurate forecasts, which can often result in implementation delays and overspend. The ultimate outcome that the IPA Benchmarking Service is intending to achieve is (a) reduced / eliminated cost variances between business case cost forecasts / estimations and actual project outturn costs (b) an improved relationship between government and ALB organisations and the supply chain i.e. enabling stronger commercial decision making through accessible and centrally managed cost data; this will be a huge benefit for organisations when negotiating on the cost of future projects ahead of and during formal procurement activity Who Are the Users The following user groups and segments have been identified through user research and analysis. One of the key findings is that many of the needs captured are agnostic across all users: User groups Benchmarking Service Custodian (IPA - Head of Central Benchmarking Service) Benchmarking Service Contributors (Government Departments & ALB's) Benchmarking Service Consumers (External Parties) User Segments: Analysis and research identified that across Contributor and Consumer user groups, there are common user needs Segments: 1. As Head of Benchmarking I require the ability to align to, access and explore a centrally managed and maintained benchmarking platform, which houses cross government and ALB project cost data for infrastructure and IT projects 2. As an SRO / Commissioner 3. As a Programme / Project Manager 4. As a Cost Estimator 5. As a Commercial Lead 6. As a Finance Lead I require the ability to access credible, quality and centrally maintained / managed project cost data I require the ability to explore project cost data by asset sector and class I require the ability to explore project cost forecast data by asset sector and class I require the ability to compare assets to one another, where common attributes are shared Work Already Done A prototype developed by the team that has been well tested and explored Existing Team In place a PM/Bussiness Analyst & Technical Solution Architect Current Phase Alpha Skills & Experience • Demonstrate experience in providing data analysis and statistical (data science) consultation on large scale data projects • Demonstrate experience of designing and developing inclusive services meeting the GDS Digital Service Standards • Experience building data centred services including front end/ back end development and reporting dashboard (using tools such as Tableau/PowerBI) • Experience doing user research with senior stakeholders across multiple departments • Experience implementing data processing (ETL) pipelines Nice to Haves • Experience with building data reporting dashboards with Tableau • Experience of implementing data ingestion from Excel files. • Building digital services that have passed GDS Beta assessments Work Location From home. There may be a need to come into London (expenses not covered by the IPA) for meetings subject to CV19 conditions Working Arrangments Weekly teams meetings/stand ups. Working from home. May require London HQ meetings Travelling expenses not provided. No expectation of overnight stays. Security Clearance A minimum of Baseline Personnel Security Standard (BPSS) standard is required for all roles. No. of Suppliers to Evaluate 5 Proposal Criteria • Proposed supplier team structure, with evidence to demonstrate a strong team and how their skills and experience will deliver the required outcomes • Evidence that your proposed approach and methodology for delivery will successfully deliver working software to meet user needs and meet specified acceptance criteria. • Value for money and quality, assessed in comparison to other pitching suppliers. • Evidenced successful delivery of similar projects • Evidence of working with data and reporting dashboards • Identification of risk and plan to mitigate them Cultural Fit Criteria • Can work with clients with low technical expertise • Work as a team with our organisation and other suppliers • Works openly and transparently • Challenge the status quo Payment Approach Time and materials Assessment Method • Case study • Presentation Evaluation Weighting Technical competence 40% Cultural fit 20% Price 40% Questions from Suppliers 1. Noting that a prototype has been developed, please could you confirm whether there is an incumbent supplier for this activity? No incumbent supplier. The prototype was developed in house by the IPA. We require skills outside the IPA for Beta development and this is why we are going out to the marketplace Best 2. s there a preferred technology stack for taking the prototype forward? If so, please could you describe it? The technology choice for Beta is not yet set in stone, and can be suggested by the supplier. The technology stack should be based on Open Source programming languages and frameworks (such as NodeJS, Java, RoR) and deployed on AWS. We are planning to use PostgreSQL (AWS RDS) for the database and Tableau for the data dashboards. There may be further design influencers coming from cross-government technology groups. 3. If the solution is defined and accepted, has an independent review been undertaken to validate the solution against industry standards and best practices? The IPA has set out the best practices approach to benchmarking through extensive research and testing of processes/products, The IPA is comfortable that we have a strong solution that meets/exceeds industry standards and best practices 4. Noting that a prototype has been developed, please could you confirm whether there is a defined and accepted solution in place and as such this request is for expertise to implement said solution only, or is there scope for examining the prototype to determine possible optimisations and re-designs? During Beta, we will be building on the prototype proof of concept and we are very open to optimisation and re-designs where this benefits the existing user needs being tested through the current visualisations 5. Will IPA be undergoing a GDS beta assessment? Yes we will be once we have procured the team to support 6. Has IPA conducted an alpha assessment? We are going for an Alpha Asssesment in the next 2 weeks. We are comfortable with our prototype and for this assessment 7. You mention Power BI and Tableau – we presume you want only one product – do you have a preference please?Do you have a preferred cloud provider in mind to host this please? The preference was for a PowerBI based on a steer from user organisational level insights and some dashboards were done in PowerBI in Alpha. However this may need to change, dependent upon Cabinet Office architecture guidance. Our team is finalising the choice of data reporting tool.Yes, the preferred cloud provider is AWS 8. Is there any discovery/alpha documentation we can access? This will be available to the winning bidder
Timeline
- Completed: Tender published1 June 2021Current notice
- Completed: Submission date15 June 2021
About the buyer
Infrastructure and Projects Authority is a public sector buyer in United Kingdom publishing tenders and awards on Stotles. Explore their procurement activity and find more opportunities like this one.
Decision makers
Connect with the people behind this procurement.
| Contact name | Job title | Phone number | Work email |
|---|---|---|---|
| Head of Procurement | +44 •••• •••••• | ••••••••@infrastructure-and-projects-authority.gov | |
| Commercial Director | +44 •••• •••••• | ••••••••@infrastructure-and-projects-authority.gov | |
| Procurement Manager | +44 •••• •••••• | ••••••••@infrastructure-and-projects-authority.gov | |
| Category Lead | +44 •••• •••••• | ••••••••@infrastructure-and-projects-authority.gov | |
| Senior Buyer | +44 •••• •••••• | ••••••••@infrastructure-and-projects-authority.gov | |
| Contracts Manager | +44 •••• •••••• | ••••••••@infrastructure-and-projects-authority.gov |
Related topics
Topics related to IPA Benchmarking Hub Service (Beta), ranked by notice volume.
- 1,484£14.9bn
Related buyers
Buyers similar to Infrastructure and Projects Authority.
- 1,716£205.5bn
- 461£2.1bn
- 372£250.0m
- 364£15.0bn
- 294£2.8bn
- 267£19.9bn
- 253£515.5m
- 203£1.0bn
- 159£1.3bn
- 142£900.0m
Win more public sector contracts
Track every UK and Ireland tender in one place — set up alerts, find decision-makers, and never miss an opportunity.
