Closed tender

Criminal Justice System Common Platform Programme - Identity Access Management Citizen Disovery

Details

Published
26 January 2017
Submission
9 February 2017

Tender description

Summary of the work Deliver a Common Platform Gate Pack for the Discovery to Alpha transition including: • HLD to extend the IdAM platform to support this service, including estimates for resourcing • Prioritised list of user needs and stories including assisted digital support • Expected delivery timescale • List of stakeholders engaged with Expected Contract Length Six to eight weeks Latest start date 01/03/2017 Why the Work is Being Done CJSCPP is a change programme to enable the CJS and agencies be more efficient and deliver a better service. For the first time, criminal case information will be kept together in one place. Parties will be able to access and update the same data set based on their security profile and associated access rights. The CJSCPP is part of a wider portfolio of change being delivered by HMCTS under the HMCTS Reform Programme, affecting services in all jurisdictions. To extend IdAM functionality a discovery exercise is being undertaken for the inclusion of various non-professional (citizen) groups within its scope. Problem to Be Solved A need has been raised to allow various non-professional “citizen” users onto systems where IdAM handles access control. • CJS processes involves several citizen “actors” (defendants, witnesses, victims, etc.) • Therefore, the platform will need to have citizens as users • Given the diverse nature of citizen users, how should the platform handle them? Who Are the Users • General Public (unauthenticated) access • Press • Case-based verified access to CPP and Reform services for specific members of the public Early Market Engagement N/A Work Already Done The primary development and deployment of IdAM is complete. IdAM currently supports professional user authentication (with and without 2FA). It supports self-service where possible and it supports organisations with a hierarchy allowing each organisation to manage and support its own users. Existing Team The supplier will be working with CJSCPP IdAM delivery and PET teams along with key stakeholders of the CPP. These are comprised of a mixture of civil servants and multiple suppliers. Current Phase Live Skills & Experience • Demonstrable experience of working in multi-discipline environments focused on meeting user needs using agile methodologies and delivering digital improvement outcomes= 6% • Demonstrable experience in delivering a successful GDS Discovery=9% • Demonstrable experience of working in a secure Government programme=3% • Demonstrable experience of working with multiple cloud vendor technologies and tools (e.g Azure and UKCloud)=6% • Demonstrable experience of delivering usable IdAM solutions and integrating them in live services, by maximising use of the products and minimising custom development=6% Nice to Haves • Demonstrable experience of working on three or more digital by default government services with high transaction volumes (100k p/a) and meeting digital by default service standard criteria=3% • ForgeRock delivery experience supporting the ForgeRock product stack=2% • Demonstrable experience of adopting agile approaches in delivering a number of IdAM solutions in large complex environments – demonstrating best practices and approach=2% • Be able to hit the ground running and engage with the stakehiolders an no later than 1st March 2017=3% Work Location Central London location; initially Southern House, Wellesley Grove, Croydon, CR9 1WW (the 'Base location', although some UK Travel may be expected) Working Arrangments The suppliers team will be required to work on site at the base location working a five (5) day week. The Service is being delivered against the GDS Service Manual (e.g. agile delivery aligned to scrum methodology). For any work performed at a location different to that of the Base location and London (outside of the M25), all reasonable travel and expenses costs shall be met in accordance with the rates set out in the MoJ travel and subsistence policy. All expenses will require prior approval before being reimbursed. Security Clearance Disclosure Scotland. See www.disclosurescotland.co.uk/basicdisclosureonline/index.htm and Baseline Personnel Security Check (BPSS) which must be dated within three months of the start date. See https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-baseline-personnel-security-standard for further guidance. Additional T&Cs Any expenses shall be submitted in line with the Ministry of Justice standard Travel and Subsistence policy and agreed in advance of expenditure. No. of Suppliers to Evaluate 5 Proposal Criteria • Overall Solution and Approach - High Level Delivery Plan, Approach and Method, Timescales, Risks and Dependencies and Quality=6% • Proposed team structure (including CVs of key members) - Reference contract/ case studies examples including linked CV’s=8% • Value for Money - how the proposal will optimise costs and generate savings=6% Cultural Fit Criteria • Explain your proposed approach for working with co-located, multi-vendor HMCTS/CPS team - demonstration of transparency and collaboration, including ability to engage and work with users at all levels=5% • Explain how you would maintain a no-blame culture and encourage people to learn from their mistakes=5% Payment Approach Time and materials Evaluation Weighting Technical competence 60% Cultural fit 10% Price 30% Questions from Suppliers 1. Bidder Q&A Session Please note a teleconference will take place on Monday 06/02/2017 at 15:00 - 16:00. Dial in details to follow. It will be helpful if bidders can ask the questions they've already submitted. 2. Q&A Session Teleconference Dial in details Dial in details as follows: 0800 917 1956 (mobile 0208 839 3652) participant PIN 58214721# 3. Q&A Session Follow Up Answers to all questions to be published asap. Please Email me (david.baxter@justice.gsi.gov.uk) if you want a copy of the information pack. 4. Are there any other scenarios which need to be covered during discovery phases? Yes, this is for citizen access with a primary focus on defendants charged for minor offences, so can complete information and plead on-line and also for members of the press to access court results. 5. Is there predetermined reliance on Verify? That is to be considered during the discovery phase. Verify may be considered an appropriate option, however, following our initial inception, we do not think Verify can be the only solution and other solutions need to be explored. 6. When we say minor offences, do we mean non-imprisonable offences? Yes, initially, cases which defendants are not needed to attend court, e.g. TfL cases. 7. Are any other MOJ cases, like probate/divorce in scope? The solution designed for citizens needs to be flexible to cater for citizens in both the crime and civil and tribunal space, but initially the focus will be on crime. 8. Will this system cater for every defendant, e.g. non-UK resident? We will not be able to capture every type of user, but the discovery session will be used to establish the major ones. 9. Are safeguards and policy around public data in place? Any data captured is already protected. As part of Citizen discovery it will have to include any additional safeguards to managing the data. 10. Is the Agile scrum process well embedded? How would you rate is from 1-10? We’re an Agile Programme, and all associated Agile processes are embedded. We use Jira/Confluence for stories, managing backlogs and storing documents, etc. 11. Are the stakeholder groups still available from the initial go-live project or have the stakeholder groups and representatives been prepared for the new project? It’s a combination; the requirements are governed by other projects on CPP and Reform and it is the relevant team members from these projects that will form the key stakeholders for this Discovery. Projects have been made aware that their input will be required to workshops, etc. User research may also play a major role in the Discovery. 12. Is there expectation of existing stakeholders to free up time for workshops? Yes. 13. What is your approximate budget for this phase? We do have a budget, though we’re not going to reveal the budget, we will give an indication of the type of roles we will anticipate within the team, and rate ranges of each respective role.

Timeline

  1. Completed: Tender published26 January 2017
    Current notice
  2. Completed: Submission date9 February 2017

About the buyer

HM Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) is a public sector buyer in United Kingdom publishing tenders and awards on Stotles. Explore their procurement activity and find more opportunities like this one.

AI insights

  • Is there a preferred supplier?
  • What are the buyers pain points?
  • What has the buyer previously procured?
  • What are the key requirements?
Sign-up to enrich

Decision makers

Connect with the people behind this procurement.

Contact nameJob titlePhone numberWork email
Head of Procurement+44 •••• ••••••
Commercial Director+44 •••• ••••••
Procurement Manager+44 •••• ••••••
Category Lead+44 •••• ••••••
Senior Buyer+44 •••• ••••••
Contracts Manager+44 •••• ••••••

Related topics

Topics related to Criminal Justice System Common Platform Programme - Identity Access Management Citizen Disovery, ranked by notice volume.

View all topics
TopicCountValue
  1. 1,283
    £16.9bn
  2. 11,175
    £1.0tn
  3. 26,970
    £1.7tn
  4. 4,672
    £63.7bn
  5. 4,815
    £66.2bn

Related buyers

Buyers similar to HM Courts and Tribunal Service (HMCTS).

View all buyers

Win more public sector contracts

Track every UK and Ireland tender in one place — set up alerts, find decision-makers, and never miss an opportunity.